Tag: jeremy renner

onceuponatime-lord:

imyouraziraphale:

devildoll:

rob-anybody:

emberfine:

deducing-opera-ghost-of-asgard:

iloveitwhenyoucallmebigpapagena:

lucyliued-deactivated20210528:

Scarlett Johansson puts Extra’s interviewer in his place after he asks: Were you able to wear undergarments [under your suit]?

Scarlett #1

Actresses are asked such INANE, bullshit, “sexy” questions by male interviewers, thank god she actually calls them out

I love how Jeremy is just cracking up the entire time.

His face in the first one.  It’s just so… “Oh god, you are in for it now.  I’m just gonna look at my hands while she tears you open.”

My love for Scarlett Johansson just went through the stratosphere.

There is nothing not awesome about this, because not only does she say things that should be said often and more loudly, but Renner’s reaction gives it another layer of win. ScarJo is sick of this shit, and Renner knows you’re really gonna get it now.

I’m in hardcore lesbians with you. 

^^^^^^

All of the above, BUT ALSO right…

Undergarments that minimise VPL are a thing that are all over magazines and advertising aimed at women. They have been for a while now. It is a feat of engineering that has been conquered in the realm of ladies underwear.

It is, in fact, old news.

I AM MORE INTERESTED IN HOW JEREMY RENNER DEALS WITH VPL. His outfit was pretty skin-tight yeah? ALSO CHRIS EVANS. Like… the one issue of GQ that I’ve read? Has NOTHING about this. I assume other publications aimed at men are similar. I’ve not seen anything in shops that addresses this conundrum. Do they…just go without? Doesn’t that chafe with all the running and jumping and falling off buildings? Do they have specially engineered pants that utilise years of research into minimising VPL in the perfect LBD?